Ein Barrierefreiheits-Widget ist kein Ersatz für ein ordentliches Audit, und wir sagen das lieber gleich vorweg, statt es als Randbemerkung am Ende zu verstecken. Trotzdem ist ein Widget oft der schnellste Weg zu sichtbaren, sofortigen Verbesserungen, während ein tieferes Nachbesserungsprojekt läuft, und die Unterschiede zwischen den Anbietern sind größer, als die fast identischen Funktionslisten vermuten lassen.
Wir haben diese sieben vor allem danach bewertet, was über die anfängliche Skript-Installation hinaus passiert: Standardabdeckung, die tatsächlich zu Ihrem Markt passt, ob Monitoring und manuelle Prüfung gebündelt oder separat verkauft werden, und Preistransparenz.
-
Führt diese Liste an durch die Kombination aus KI-gestütztem Widget, kontinuierlichem Monitoring und einem manuellen Checker in einem Abonnement, mit von Anfang an eingebauter EAA- und EN-301-549-Abdeckung statt nachträglich ergänzt.
Vor- und Nachteile ansehen
Vorteile
- Publishes exact widget and monitoring prices on its site rather than hiding them behind a sales call
- Pairs the widget with a separate continuous-monitoring product and a human-reviewed accessibility checker instead of automation alone
- Explicit EAA and EN 301 549 mapping across multiple EU markets, ahead of most US-headquartered competitors on European regulation
- One-line JavaScript install with native Shopify, WordPress and Google Tag Manager support
Nachteile
- Requires a separate paid subscription for each subdomain, which can raise the effective cost for sites split across shop./blog./app. style subdomains
- Newer, smaller vendor with little independent review history on sites like G2 or Capterra compared to established competitors
- Like all overlay-widget products, an AI-adjusted layer cannot substitute for full manual code remediation on complex sites
- Enterprise-tier pricing for the widget and monitor is not published and requires contacting sales
Ab From EUR 23.75/mo (billed yearly) or EUR 29.90/mo (billed monthly) for the Starter widget plan, up to 100k monthly page views; a separate Accessibility Monitor product starts at EUR 27.90-34.90/mo for 50 pages
-
Bestes Preis-Leistungs-VerhältnisEqualWeb
Eine breite Spanne an Preisstufen und ein echter Weg zu manueller Nachbesserung als separatem Service, was zu Unternehmen passt, die erwarten, aus reiner Automatisierung herauszuwachsen.
Vor- und Nachteile ansehen
Vorteile
- Publishes exact pricing for every self-serve tier, from a $39/mo entry plan up to a 100,000-page Huge tier, unusual transparency for this category
- Wide standards coverage including WCAG 2.1, ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549 and EAA in one product
- Strong independent review record: 4.6/5 average across roughly 43 G2 reviews, with reviewers repeatedly citing responsive human support
- Offers manual remediation and audits as a distinct paid add-on rather than selling automation as a complete fix
Nachteile
- Multiple G2 reviewers say the entry pricing is still hard for very small organizations to sustain long-term
- Some reviewers describe the management dashboard's UI/UX as dated or hard to navigate
- The Managed tier with expert remediation is quoted individually rather than published
- As with any overlay widget, achieving full legal compliance depends on more than the automated layer, something reviewers explicitly flag
Ab From $39/mo ($390/yr) for the Small widget tier, up to 100 pages; Medium is $49/mo, Large $109/mo, Huge $169/mo, with a custom-quoted Managed tier that adds expert remediation
-
Beste GesamtwertungAudioEye
Börsennotiert und offen darüber, Automatisierung mit menschlicher Prüfung durch die Accessibility Management Platform zu kombinieren.
Vor- und Nachteile ansehen
Vorteile
- Publicly traded (Nasdaq: AEYE), giving it a level of audited financial disclosure most competitors don't have
- Explicitly combines automated scanning and widget fixes with human-in-the-loop expert testing, rather than automation alone
- Strong independent review record: 4.7/5 average across roughly 240 G2 reviews, with reviewers citing responsive support and easy setup
- Named a G2 Best Software Product with multiple category badges in 2026
Nachteile
- Exact plan pricing is not published on its site; buyers must go through a quote process even for the entry tier
- Some reviewers report an overwhelming volume of automated recommendations and occasional reporting inaccuracies
- Reviewers flag pricing as steep for smaller, budget-conscious businesses relative to widget-only competitors
- Full remediation still depends on the paid Managed or Self-Managed tiers; the base Automated plan covers only automation-fixable issues
Ab Pricing not published - contact sales for a quote; third-party listings have cited a Basic automated-only plan starting around $49/mo, but AudioEye's own pricing page does not disclose figures
-
Eine starke Wahl speziell für italienische und EU-Käufer im öffentlichen Sektor, dank tiefer Vertrautheit mit dem Stanca-Gesetz neben dem EAA.
Vor- und Nachteile ansehen
Vorteile
- Publishes exact widget pricing by page-volume tier, unlike most audit-and-widget competitors
- Combines the widget with expert manual audits, remediation guidance and litigation support rather than automation alone
- Deep specialization in Italian public-sector law (the Stanca Act) alongside EAA and EN 301 549
- Reviewers on G2 consistently mention responsive, hands-on support during setup
Nachteile
- Platform (audit/monitoring) tier pricing is not published and requires a custom quote
- Very small public review base (single digits on G2), so independent sentiment is thin compared to larger competitors
- Primarily marketed to the Italian and broader EU market, with less name recognition elsewhere
- As with any overlay widget, automated fixes cannot resolve every structural accessibility issue on complex sites
Ab Widget from EUR 490/yr (Standard, up to 1,000 pages), rising to EUR 1,490/yr and EUR 3,490/yr for higher page limits; the Accessiway Platform (audit/monitoring) tiers are quoted individually and not published
-
Die stärkste Wahl für deutsche und österreichische öffentliche Einrichtungen, die BITV 2.0 neben EAA-Anforderungen bewältigen müssen.
Vor- und Nachteile ansehen
Vorteile
- Deep specialization in German BITV 2.0 public-sector procurement requirements alongside the wider EAA
- Combines the Assist widget with a documented, standby expert team for troubleshooting rather than automation alone
- GDPR-compliant by design and reviewers note installation takes only minutes
- Independent reviewers give it a solid 4.4/5 overall expert score
Nachteile
- Pricing is no longer published anywhere on its site; every quote requires a demo or sales call
- Independent reviewers explicitly describe it as "quite expensive" relative to comparable widgets
- No live chat support, only phone, email and contact forms
- Public review volume is limited, so independent sentiment data is thinner than for larger competitors
Ab Pricing not published - Eye-Able no longer lists prices on its site and requires a demo or sales call for a quote
-
Der bekannteste Name der Kategorie, mit einer wirklich nützlichen kostenlosen Stufe für sehr kleine Websites und einem großen Integrations-Ökosystem.
Vor- und Nachteile ansehen
Vorteile
- Genuine free tier for small sites, alongside paid plans, unusual among established widget vendors
- Very large independent review base: 4.8/5 average across roughly 650+ G2 reviews
- Large plugin ecosystem across Shopify, WordPress, Wix and other platforms
- AI-powered image recognition for automated alt text generation
Nachteile
- Faced a class-action lawsuit (BloomsyBox v. UserWay, filed 2024) alleging false advertising about the widget's ability to ensure ADA compliance; a magistrate judge let the core claims proceed in February 2026
- UserWay's own pricing page does not publish figures; specific tier prices come from third-party trackers, not the vendor directly
- G2 reviewers frequently note pricing is on the higher end versus alternatives, and want clearer coverage information
- As with any overlay widget, the tool doesn't achieve full compliance on its own and complex issues still need developer work
Ab Free tier available; paid Accessibility Widget Pro starts around $69/mo, with Pro Plus around $169/mo and Ultimate around $359/mo (per third-party pricing trackers, since UserWay's own pricing page does not display figures)
-
Ein großer, stark beworbener Anbieter; lesen Sie die FTC-Verfügung von 2025 zu den Automatisierungsaussagen von accessWidget, bevor Sie sich allein auf das Marketing verlassen.
Vor- und Nachteile ansehen
Vorteile
- Publishes exact tiered pricing by traffic level rather than requiring a sales call for standard plans
- One of the largest customer bases in the widget category, with well over 1,500 reviews on G2
- Bundles litigation-support documentation and, on higher tiers, direct ADA attorney consultation with the subscription
- Fast, developer-light install that reviewers consistently describe as taking only minutes
Nachteile
- In 2025 the FTC ordered accessiBe to pay $1 million over findings that it overstated how much of a site accessWidget could automatically make WCAG-compliant, and ran undisclosed paid reviews
- Reviewers report unexpected charges and a cancellation process that can require going through email support
- An automated overlay layer alone does not fix every accessibility barrier on complex or custom-built sites
- Pricing scales with traffic, so growing sites can see costs climb tier to tier
Ab From $59/mo (or $490/yr billed annually) for the Micro tier, up to 5,000 monthly visits; Growth is $179/mo and Scale is $479/mo, with custom Enterprise pricing above 100,000 visits
Was wir hier nicht bewertet haben
Deque und Allyant stehen nicht auf dieser Liste, weil sie im eigentlichen Sinn keine Widget-Anbieter sind: Deque verkauft Entwickler-Testwerkzeuge auf Basis von axe-core, und Allyant ist auf großformatige Dokument- und PDF-Nachbesserung spezialisiert. Beide sind einen Blick wert, wenn ein Skript-Widget nicht das ist, was Sie tatsächlich brauchen. Siehe unsere Leitfäden zur Wahl zwischen Widget und manuellem Audit sowie speziell zur PDF-Nachbesserung.
Weiterlesen
Wenn Sie noch entscheiden müssen, ob ein Widget überhaupt der richtige Einstieg ist, geht unser Leitfaden zu dem, was Accessibility-Overlays leisten können und was nicht, ausführlicher auf die unabhängige Forschung zu dieser Frage ein.